Webb9 juni 2011 · As the Court a quo also acknowledged, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal pointed out in Philotex (Pty) Ltd and Others v Snyman and Others 1998 (2) SA 138 (SCA) at 142H, (a judgment concerning the interpretation of s 424(1) of the South African Companies Act, 1973 (Act 61 of 1973) which is worded not too dissimilar to s 64(1) of … Webb26 sep. 2006 · ‘Recklessness’ includes gross negligence with or without consciousness of risk taking (see for example Philotex (Pty) Ltd v Snyman 1 where the law is succinctly …

Home - Juta

WebbPhilotex Pty Ltd and Others v Snyman and Others Braitex May 3rd, 2024 - Philotex Pty Ltd and Others v Snyman and Others Braitex Pty Ltd and Others v Snyman and Others 334 … Webb20 mars 2014 · [1] These propositions as to the nature of reckless trading are derived from Philotex (Pty) Ltd and Others v Snyman and Others: Braitex (Pty) Ltd and Others v … hillside animal boarding frostburg md

Ebrahim v Airports Cold Storage - StuDocu

WebbGrounds for delinquency c c a a aa bb a b c a a c a a c et al et al idem a prescribed officer Myeni c et al Grancy Property Limited v Gihwala In re: Grancy Property Limited v Gihwala c c c a b c a c bb c c Gihwala Gihwala … Webb8 jan. 2013 · It in turn is a codification of the common law approach described by Lord Hoffman in Norman v Theodore Goddard [1991] BCLC 1028 and Re D'Jan of London Ltd [1993] BCC 646. This so called subjective objective approach was followed in South Africa in Howard v Herrigel NNO 1991 (2) SA 660 (A) and Philotex (Pty) Ltd v Snyman; Braitex … WebbPhilotex (Pty) Ltd v Snyman 1998 (2) SA 138 (SCA) Robinson v Imroth and Others 1917 WLD 159 . 10.1. Introduction . A company is a separate juristic person. It is, however, not a p erson in the physical . sense. It acts mainly through two o rgans. The first is . the shareholders in general m eeting (see the previous . hillside air conditioning